UNESCO and the World Natural Heritage
UNESCO (the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) was founded in 1945 in the aftermath of the Second World War, with the mission of promoting peace through international cooperation in education, science and culture. One of its most prominent instruments is the World Heritage Convention, adopted in 1972, which aims to identify, protect and transmit to future generations cultural and natural properties of outstanding universal value.
Natural sites inscribed on the World Heritage List are recognised for the exceptional significance of their landscapes, biodiversity, geological formations or ecological processes. Their inscription is based on specific criteria defined by the Convention, notably those related to natural phenomena, biological diversity or exceptional natural beauty. As with cultural heritage, UNESCO does not limit recognition to isolated sites: some natural properties are inscribed as coherent ensembles, sometimes spread across several areas or territories, known as serial properties.
It is important to clearly distinguish World Heritage inscription from other UNESCO programmes, notably the “Man and the Biosphere” (MAB) programme. Biosphere reserves established under this programme aim primarily to reconcile nature conservation, sustainable development and human activities. They function as laboratories for environmental and territorial management, but they do not fall under the World Heritage Convention and do not represent recognition of outstanding universal value in the sense of UNESCO World Heritage listing.
Inscription of a natural site on the World Heritage List is neither automatic nor permanent. It entails strict requirements in terms of protection, long-term management and legal frameworks. States Parties commit to preserving the ecological integrity of the sites, limiting human pressures incompatible with their conservation and regularly reporting on their state of conservation. In cases of serious degradation or inadequate management, a site may be placed on the List of World Heritage in Danger or, exceptionally, removed from the List.
UNESCO’s role is primarily normative and incentive-based. The organisation provides only limited financial support for the protection of natural sites; primary responsibility lies with States, local authorities and competent environmental management bodies. The UNESCO label is sometimes perceived as a guarantee of absolute protection or as an automatic driver of tourism, whereas it represents above all a long-term international commitment to conservation.
Finally, the World Natural Heritage List also reflects geographical and historical imbalances. Certain types of landscapes or regions of the world remain underrepresented. UNESCO therefore encourages more balanced inscriptions in order to better reflect the global diversity of natural environments and ecosystems.
In this context, UNESCO recognition of natural sites should not be understood as a hierarchy of landscapes, but as a tool for recognition, protection and international awareness, aimed at safeguarding natural areas whose value and fragility extend beyond national borders.

Français (France)
Nederlands (nl-NL)