Select your language
Bhonsle of Kolhapur
Glossaries
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Bhonsle of Kolhapur | The Bhonsles of Kolhapur are a branch of the Maratha royal house descended from Shivaji. They governed Kolhapur State in western India from around 1710 to 1949. Their history connects Maratha kingship, palace architecture and social reform, particularly under Shahu. The term “Bhonsles of Kolhapur” denotes the branch of the Bhonsle family that ruled Kolhapur, also known as Karvir. Its territory lay principally in southern Maharashtra and included possessions in northern Karnataka. This branch should be distinguished from the Bhonsles of Satara, Nagpur and Thanjavur. Its origins lie in Shivaji’s succession. After the death of his son Rajaram in 1700, Tarabai governed on behalf of their son Shivaji II. The release of Shahu, Shivaji’s grandson, in 1707 triggered a struggle for the Maratha throne. Shahu established his authority at Satara, while Tarabai and her son maintained a base around Panhala and Kolhapur. A palace coup brought Sambhaji II, another son of Rajaram, to power in 1714. The Treaty of Warna in 1731 stabilized the division between Satara and Kolhapur. Kolhapur’s rulers bore the title chhatrapati, associated with the royal tradition established by Shivaji. In their relations with the British, they were also designated rajas and later maharajas. Their authority extended over directly administered districts and subordinate estates whose chiefs retained certain hereditary rights. Adoption enabled the ruling house to maintain dynastic continuity without direct biological succession. The dynasty’s architectural heritage includes royal residences, religious institutions supported by the court and fortresses used as military or political centres. Panhala Fort played an important part in the establishment of the branch, although its origins predate the Bhonsles of Kolhapur. Kolhapur’s New Palace, completed in the nineteenth century, illustrates the architectural culture of princely courts, combining several Indian and European traditions. A monument’s association with the dynasty may therefore reflect its construction, alteration, occupation or patronage. Under Shahu, who acceded in 1884 and assumed personal government in 1894, the state developed education, irrigation and measures supporting the representation of disadvantaged communities. The court also encouraged music, theatre and wrestling. Although Hindu, the dynasty supported Muslim, Jain and Christian institutions, particularly educational establishments. Increasingly subject to British paramountcy during the nineteenth century, Kolhapur retained its princely administration through Indian independence. Its merger with Bombay on 1 March 1949 ended the dynasty’s territorial government. The family and its dynastic titles continued beyond that date.
|

Français (France)
Nederlands (nl-NL)